The “Merantun Way transformation and AFC Wimbledon masterplan” identified insurance giant Aviva as providing a new stadium for AFC Wimbledon on the site of the Savacentre, currently home to
Sainsbury’s and M&S.
"In our opinion they are beyond economic regeneration. Our recommendation is that the existing sub-standard stadium and rear circuit be demolished and the site cleared.
He added: “We have set out to make a brief to ask for a new stadium created to be the best in the world, catering for 6,000 patrons."
A Merton Council spokeswoman confirmed that no formal planning application has been submitted by Mr Taggart, or Hamilton architects, who have created the design.
The plans include:
a 1,500 capacity ground floor concourse with bars and direct access to track-side terraces;
A carvery restaurant with 400 seats;
A 700-person restaurant on the first and second floors;
Eight luxury corporate suites.
The leader of Merton Council, Stephen Alambritis, said he still wanted AFC Wimbledon back at Plough Lane and would not be drawn on whether he would support or oppose a new greyhound stadium being
built in Plough Lane instead.
He said: “Plough Lane is ripe for development and we have allocated the site for sporting intensification.
“I have always been of the opinion that the dog track will be very attractive to someone, whether it is AFC Wimbledon or this application."
He added: “Everyone is aware of my support to bring back AFC Wimbledon.
"It is sobering news for them but they can put in their own planning application for the site.
“I believe the dog track is the most appropriate home for AFC Wimbledon, but it is for them to put in an application and find the resources to build a football stadium.”
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network | A Gannett Company
Newsquest (London) Ltd, Loudwater Mill, Station Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. HP10 9TY|3105111|Registered in England & Wales
This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here