Surrey Police seized 20 motorbikes and two cars as park of a crackdown on law-breaking motorists.
During the operation officers spotted one motorcyclist riding at 102mph in a 50mph zone on the A24 southbound from Leatherhead towards Box Hill.
That rider was reported and is due to be summonsed to court.
The operation was carried out over the bank holiday weekend by Surrey Police and the Surrey Safety Camera Partnership which patrolled sites around the county.
In total 112 endorsable fixed penalty notices were issued for offences including speeding, failing to have insurance, failing to have a driving licence, or using a mobile phone.
Of those 91 were issued to car drivers and 21 to bikers.
advertisement
Chief Inspector Stuart Sang, head of Surrey's Roads Policing Unit, said: "The majority of riders out over the bank holiday were supportive of police activity and travelled safely through the county. In fact it should be noted that more than two thirds of those caught breaking the speed limit were car drivers.
“Despite our warnings however a significant number of bikers failed to have valid insurance or a proper driving licence and as a result their vehicles were seized.”
Chief Inspector Stuart Sang
"Despite our warnings however a significant number of bikers failed to have valid insurance or a proper driving licence and as a result their vehicles were seized."
According to Surrey Police despite accounting for just one per cent of road users, around a quarter of those who die each year on Surrey's roads are motorcyclists.
To try and educate bikers about the dangers, officers handed out safety advice at popular motorcycle meeting points including Box Hill and Newlands Corner.
Posted by: Bernie, The Road to Hell on 11:26pm Fri 9 May 08
I don't know about the rest of you people who read this, but when it becomes apparent just how many offences are caught in a single weekend, I find it more than a little scarey the number of offences drivers and riders are clearly getting away with when there isn't an active crackdown in progressthe the other 362 days of the year.
It's sad to see road safety has declined so baddly over the last ten or so years and the law held in such obvious contempt leaving the rest of us law abiding citizen in such obvious danger when all thats left on the street is a handful of aging speed cameras and these officers are draughted off to another country for a similar couple of day crackdown elsewhere.
Alistair Darling has a lot to answer for when he signed us up to the speed camera program.
I don't know about the rest of you people who read this, but when it becomes apparent just how many offences are caught in a single weekend, I find it more than a little scarey the number of offences drivers and riders are clearly getting away with when there isn't an active crackdown in progressthe the other 362 days of the year.
It's sad to see road safety has declined so baddly over the last ten or so years and the law held in such obvious contempt leaving the rest of us law abiding citizen in such obvious danger when all thats left on the street is a handful of aging speed cameras and these officers are draughted off to another country for a similar couple of day crackdown elsewhere.
Alistair Darling has a lot to answer for when he signed us up to the speed camera program.
Posted by: Bernie, The Former United Kingdom. on 11:36pm Fri 9 May 08
Sorry, I meant, these officers are draughted off to another 'County'
With policys like these it's little wonder the government took such a good drubbing the other week.
Disgusting, give us back our traffic police Ms Smith, you given in trying to police the yobs by proxy, have the deceny to admit it was a failure on the roads as well.
Sorry, I meant, these officers are draughted off to another 'County'
With policys like these it's little wonder the government took such a good drubbing the other week.
Disgusting, give us back our traffic police Ms Smith, you given in trying to police the yobs by proxy, have the deceny to admit it was a failure on the roads as well.
Bernie, I could not agree with you more. It is frightening. I remember getting into a minicab one night. The driver, who admitted he'd only arrived 2 days previous pulled out an A to Z, and asked me to direct him. Apparently, a "Patel" licence operates in some minicab firms, where all the drivers are "Patel", and work under copies of the same licence.
Nightbus, or proper hackney cab for me. Put your life in your hands with any other, just don't complain when something goes wrong, cos you've been warned in a poster campaign.
Bernie, I could not agree with you more. It is frightening. I remember getting into a minicab one night. The driver, who admitted he'd only arrived 2 days previous pulled out an A to Z, and asked me to direct him. Apparently, a "Patel" licence operates in some minicab firms, where all the drivers are "Patel", and work under copies of the same licence.
Nightbus, or proper hackney cab for me. Put your life in your hands with any other, just don't complain when something goes wrong, cos you've been warned in a poster campaign.
Weren't the partnership people patting themselves on the back in the press recently, because convictions were going down, therefore less people were speeding and they're doing a great job?
This blows that pile of cattle manure out of the water a bit, doesn't it.
Weren't the partnership people patting themselves on the back in the press recently, because convictions were going down, therefore less people were speeding and they're doing a great job?
This blows that pile of cattle manure out of the water a bit, doesn't it.
Posted by: Hazel, chessington on 8:01pm Sat 10 May 08
I'm sorry but anyone who finds this scarey is quite frankly naive to everyday life in England. If you dont believe me stand outside St Mary's school in Chessington on a week-day morning for 5 minutes, you'll need more than 1 pair of hands to count the offences being committed. Theres plenty of rules & regulations but no-one to police them!
I'm sorry but anyone who finds this scarey is quite frankly naive to everyday life in England. If you dont believe me stand outside St Mary's school in Chessington on a week-day morning for 5 minutes, you'll need more than 1 pair of hands to count the offences being committed. Theres plenty of rules & regulations but no-one to police them!
Posted by: Bernie, Home of the tax fiddle. on 10:10pm Sat 10 May 08
I think we're more or less singing from the same hymn sheet if you read my post again Hazel.
Would you prefer for me to call the absence of traffic police officers since speed cameras were set free on the roads 'terrifying' to keep you happy?
The government obviously haven't provided targets or funding to deal with the everyday offences you speak of, thats why nobody is dealing with them and nobody can argue with the self righteous propaganda of the speed camera people because no matter what you can see with your own eyes, they won't accept it as proof that their strategy simply doesn't work.
Also, no politician is going to risk his or her career to stand against this tax making regime all the time this government are in office.
Nothing more than a sub standard solution to a serious problem that happens to save a lot of money on real police as well as pay for itself in fines while doing nothing to catch the hardcore illegal drivers as these crackdowns clearly show.
Gordon Brown, you got your butt kicked a couple of weeks ago, this is one of the reasons why.
I think we're more or less singing from the same hymn sheet if you read my post again Hazel.
Would you prefer for me to call the absence of traffic police officers since speed cameras were set free on the roads 'terrifying' to keep you happy?
The government obviously haven't provided targets or funding to deal with the everyday offences you speak of, thats why nobody is dealing with them and nobody can argue with the self righteous propaganda of the speed camera people because no matter what you can see with your own eyes, they won't accept it as proof that their strategy simply doesn't work.
Also, no politician is going to risk his or her career to stand against this tax making regime all the time this government are in office.
Nothing more than a sub standard solution to a serious problem that happens to save a lot of money on real police as well as pay for itself in fines while doing nothing to catch the hardcore illegal drivers as these crackdowns clearly show.
Gordon Brown, you got your butt kicked a couple of weeks ago, this is one of the reasons why.
Posted by: Pete, Surbiton on 10:17am Sun 11 May 08
If you see that many traffic offences in Chessington that the police aren't doing anything about, then you should log them on:
http://www.betterdri
vingplease.com
That way, we can find out if it's lots of different vehicles, or if it's the same few vehicles over and over again.
Out of the 12,000+ incidents that have been reported so far, only two of them have been in Chessington.
If you see that many traffic offences in Chessington that the police aren't doing anything about, then you should log them on:
http://www.betterdri
vingplease.com
That way, we can find out if it's lots of different vehicles, or if it's the same few vehicles over and over again.
Out of the 12,000+ incidents that have been reported so far, only two of them have been in Chessington.
Personally, I don't approave of sites like www.betterdrivingple
ase.com, they're far too open to abuse where someone who's fed up with the height of his neighbours hedge could with just a group email to all his buddies and work mates, potentially get someone in a lot of trouble when in reality, that person has done nothing.
It is sad to see this almost vigilante style retribution being allowed to poliferate in the UK, mainly due to the lack of adequate policing since the surveilence nation went a bit mental.
Personally, I don't approave of sites like www.betterdrivingple
ase.com, they're far too open to abuse where someone who's fed up with the height of his neighbours hedge could with just a group email to all his buddies and work mates, potentially get someone in a lot of trouble when in reality, that person has done nothing.
It is sad to see this almost vigilante style retribution being allowed to poliferate in the UK, mainly due to the lack of adequate policing since the surveilence nation went a bit mental.
[quote][bold]Colin[/bold] wrote:
Personally, I don't approave of sites like www.betterdrivingple ase.com, they're far too open to abuse where someone who's fed up with the height of his neighbours hedge could with just a group email to all his buddies and work mates, potentially get someone in a lot of trouble when in reality, that person has done nothing. It is sad to see this almost vigilante style retribution being allowed to poliferate in the UK, mainly due to the lack of adequate policing since the surveilence nation went a bit mental.[/quote] Colin, the site is called "BetterDrivingPlease
", not "WhyAreYourHedgesSoH
igh".
I'm glad I know about the site now, I've been constantly angered by all sorts of careless drivers in Balham. Now I'm off to photograph my first batch of offenders =)
Colin wrote:
Personally, I don't approave of sites like www.betterdrivingple ase.com, they're far too open to abuse where someone who's fed up with the height of his neighbours hedge could with just a group email to all his buddies and work mates, potentially get someone in a lot of trouble when in reality, that person has done nothing. It is sad to see this almost vigilante style retribution being allowed to poliferate in the UK, mainly due to the lack of adequate policing since the surveilence nation went a bit mental.
Colin, the site is called "BetterDrivingPlease
", not "WhyAreYourHedgesSoH
igh".
I'm glad I know about the site now, I've been constantly angered by all sorts of careless drivers in Balham. Now I'm off to photograph my first batch of offenders =)
clearly the police were wrong when they decided that spending billions on cameras would save lives. it hasnt. and its not only cost us for the cameras. the fines have cost us as well.
the speed limits are out of date. they were made when you could buy a 3 litre jag that had no brakes.
this day and age cars are safer. they accelerate faster. stop quicker and are safer in a crash.
and if thats wrong. why do they sell bikes and cars that do 180mph?
if they care so much about safety they could just limit everyones car.
they dont care about safety. thats a smoke screen.
dont even get me started on your pathetic little grass people up website. honestly get a life.
clearly the police were wrong when they decided that spending billions on cameras would save lives. it hasnt. and its not only cost us for the cameras. the fines have cost us as well.
the speed limits are out of date. they were made when you could buy a 3 litre jag that had no brakes.
this day and age cars are safer. they accelerate faster. stop quicker and are safer in a crash.
and if thats wrong. why do they sell bikes and cars that do 180mph?
if they care so much about safety they could just limit everyones car.
they dont care about safety. thats a smoke screen.
dont even get me started on your pathetic little grass people up website. honestly get a life.
Posted by: Barnaby Rudge, Cheam on 3:38pm Mon 12 May 08
I love people like ric, they seem to believe that now cars are safer for passengers, that speed limits should be raised. For the last time, at 30mph you had an 80% of killing a pedestrian in the 1950's, the same still applies today, so tell me, where's the difference? We need police back on traffic patrol actually sorting offenders out rather than relying on cameras, ditch the PCSO's and spend it on something more worthwhile like traffic police.
I love people like ric, they seem to believe that now cars are safer for passengers, that speed limits should be raised. For the last time, at 30mph you had an 80% of killing a pedestrian in the 1950's, the same still applies today, so tell me, where's the difference? We need police back on traffic patrol actually sorting offenders out rather than relying on cameras, ditch the PCSO's and spend it on something more worthwhile like traffic police.
Exactly my point Jock, when did you gain the qualifications to become a police officer or has taking the law into your own hands become acceptable practice in the 21st century?
If you couldn't see my point using the hedge to represent any number of things that could annoy someone enough to complain on one of these websites, then I really do despair about the rest of the population and feel sad that I'm actually a member of the same species.
This is a step back into the dark ages and next thing we'll know, we'll have regular witch hunts for anyone who doesn't conform to the view of the very narrow minded.
Jock, without the right equipment you can't possibly know if someone is speeding or not, you can only surmise and thats where you fall down, even with an LTI20:20 like the police use you're more likely to get it wrong than right.
Bad policy, promoting bad feelings in towns and villages across the country where there was none before speed cameras and self righteous do gooders.
However, I agree with Barnaby Rudge and hope most people aren't quite so keen to jump on the bandwagon as Jock is.
Thats the point jock, no amount of cameras can replace a viable traffic police force, as can be shown clearly in the above article.
Exactly my point Jock, when did you gain the qualifications to become a police officer or has taking the law into your own hands become acceptable practice in the 21st century?
If you couldn't see my point using the hedge to represent any number of things that could annoy someone enough to complain on one of these websites, then I really do despair about the rest of the population and feel sad that I'm actually a member of the same species.
This is a step back into the dark ages and next thing we'll know, we'll have regular witch hunts for anyone who doesn't conform to the view of the very narrow minded.
Jock, without the right equipment you can't possibly know if someone is speeding or not, you can only surmise and thats where you fall down, even with an LTI20:20 like the police use you're more likely to get it wrong than right.
Bad policy, promoting bad feelings in towns and villages across the country where there was none before speed cameras and self righteous do gooders.
However, I agree with Barnaby Rudge and hope most people aren't quite so keen to jump on the bandwagon as Jock is.
Thats the point jock, no amount of cameras can replace a viable traffic police force, as can be shown clearly in the above article.
And Ric, in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with the speed limits we've got except that I think they need simplifying, there should only be three limits, 30 and 60 rural and 70 on the motorway.
In other words, if it's not safe to do 60, then it's 30.
70% ofconvictions in the country would disappear over night if they made it simpler, but then, thats the last thing they want to do, otherwise cameras would suddenly start costing an awful lot of money if there were no fines to support them.
And Ric, in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with the speed limits we've got except that I think they need simplifying, there should only be three limits, 30 and 60 rural and 70 on the motorway.
In other words, if it's not safe to do 60, then it's 30.
70% ofconvictions in the country would disappear over night if they made it simpler, but then, thats the last thing they want to do, otherwise cameras would suddenly start costing an awful lot of money if there were no fines to support them.
Posted by: Bernie, Is it dinner time on 6:19pm Mon 12 May 08
I don't think it was the police who got it wrong Ric, it was our good mate Alistair, ever so slimey, how on earth did I get to be chancellor, Darling, who signed us up to the conman, (I mean salesman) who sold speed cameras.
CPO's simply follow government guidelines and if they haven't got targets or funding for road casualty reduction from Westminster, then it simply doesn't get done, there are no targets or funding because the goverment see the number of fines, rub their mitts together in times of financial incompetence like now and kid themselves it must therefore be working.
Speed cameras, supported by easily lead simpletons and bean counters, yes, the same people, who negate on police wages and who're closing post offices, accident and emergency centres across the country, you know them as the labour government.
Don't blame the police, there was a time they were a force that was the envy of the world.
At least the Australians are starting to get a little uncomfortable taking all that money in revenue from it's citizens whilst having no significant effect on casualty reduction, as recent question in their parliament show.
I don't think it was the police who got it wrong Ric, it was our good mate Alistair, ever so slimey, how on earth did I get to be chancellor, Darling, who signed us up to the conman, (I mean salesman) who sold speed cameras.
CPO's simply follow government guidelines and if they haven't got targets or funding for road casualty reduction from Westminster, then it simply doesn't get done, there are no targets or funding because the goverment see the number of fines, rub their mitts together in times of financial incompetence like now and kid themselves it must therefore be working.
Speed cameras, supported by easily lead simpletons and bean counters, yes, the same people, who negate on police wages and who're closing post offices, accident and emergency centres across the country, you know them as the labour government.
Don't blame the police, there was a time they were a force that was the envy of the world.
At least the Australians are starting to get a little uncomfortable taking all that money in revenue from it's citizens whilst having no significant effect on casualty reduction, as recent question in their parliament show.
[quote]For the last time, at 30mph you had an 80% of killing a pedestrian in the 1950's, the same still applies today[/quote]
but we're not talking about the speed in which you hit someone. a car these days travelling at 50mph will stop quicker and safer than a 1950's car doing 30mph.
i agree with the 30mph limits in most places but 70mph on a motorway is way to slow. its should be at least 90mph
you want to make the tests harder and re takes when you hit a certain age. get the people who cant drive off the road.
i'd be happy to have harder tests carried out year after year. because i know i wouldnt be someone who would fail it.
i mean whats the point of having any speed limits if the people driving cant actually control their car. they are the people causing the accidents. not the people doing 100mph down the motorway, who happen to be confident drivers.
For the last time, at 30mph you had an 80% of killing a pedestrian in the 1950's, the same still applies today
but we're not talking about the speed in which you hit someone. a car these days travelling at 50mph will stop quicker and safer than a 1950's car doing 30mph.
i agree with the 30mph limits in most places but 70mph on a motorway is way to slow. its should be at least 90mph
you want to make the tests harder and re takes when you hit a certain age. get the people who cant drive off the road.
i'd be happy to have harder tests carried out year after year. because i know i wouldnt be someone who would fail it.
i mean whats the point of having any speed limits if the people driving cant actually control their car. they are the people causing the accidents. not the people doing 100mph down the motorway, who happen to be confident drivers.
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
Print
Email this
Comment
